Urology
 |
|
7 december 2019 03:03:27 |
| Reply to Arnaldo Stanzione, Massimo Imbriaco, and Renato Cuocolo`s Letter to the Editor re: Marloes van der Leest, Bas Israël, Eric Bastiaan Cornel, et al. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility. Eur Urol 2019;76:574-81. Are We Meeting Our Standards? Stringent Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Acquisition Requirements Might be Limiting Prostate (European Urology) |
|
Tweet We greatly appreciate the thorough analysis of the imaging acquisition parameters of the prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol we used in our study. Prostate Imaging- Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.0 was designed to standardize image acquisition, interpretation, and reporting [1]. The image acquisition parameters are based on expert consensus and are meant to assist in obtaining optimal prostate MR images. However, there are always minor deviations in consensus-based recommendations among its creators. |
| 368 viewsCategory: Urology |
 Re: Eugene Shkolyar, Xiao Jia, Timothy C. Chang, et al. Augmented Bladder Tumor Detection Using Deep Learning. Eur Urol 2019;76:714-8 (European Urology)Re: Cancer Screening in the Pediatric Cancer Patient: A Focus on Genitourinary Malignancies, and Why Does a Urologist Need to Know About This? (European Urology) 
|
| blog comments powered by Disqus |
MyJournals.org
The latest issues of all your favorite science journals on one page
The latest issues of all your favorite science journals on one page